[mutt-dev] Thread Index

• Chronological Index · RSS feed

• [PATCH 0 of 4] [RFC] sendbox rework, agriffis   (April 28, 2009)
  • [PATCH 2 of 4] Add resent header weeding, used by sendbox, agriffis   (April 28, 2009)  
  • [PATCH 3 of 4] Add support for sendbox (primary send path), agriffis   (April 28, 2009)  
  • [PATCH 1 of 4] Create mutt_write_postponed, de-bastardize mutt_write_fcc, agriffis   (April 28, 2009)  
  • [PATCH 4 of 4] Add support for sendbox (bounce path), agriffis   (April 28, 2009)  
   
• Re: [Mutt] #626: when showing directory of Maildir's the date field, Mutt   (April 29, 2009)
• Re: [Mutt] #2421: mutt does not show number of or indicator for new, Mutt   (April 29, 2009)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Mutt] #2421: mutt does not show number of or indicator for new, Mutt   (July 01, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #2421: mutt does not show number of or indicator for new, Mutt   (July 31, 2009)  
   
• Friend, are you giving up?, asanka hettige   (May 03, 2009)
• [PATCH] Reset atime when leaving mbox/mmdf with new mail, Rocco Rutte   (May 12, 2009)
• Fwd: WG Review: Yet Another Mail (yam), Thomas Roessler   (May 12, 2009)
• Re: [Mutt] #2725: Bug#375530: index weirdness if mailbox is emptied, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)
• Re: [Mutt] #2044: don't mark as answered if no in-reply-to, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)
• [Mutt] #3225: new mail notifications are lost too easily, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)
  • Re: [Mutt] #3225: new mail notifications are lost too easily, Gary Johnson   (May 13, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3225: new mail notifications are lost too easily, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3225: new mail notifications are lost too easily, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)  
   
• [Mutt] #3226: segfault in imap_sync_mailbox, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)
  • Re: [Mutt] #3226: segfault in imap_sync_mailbox, Mutt   (May 13, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3226: segfault in imap_sync_mailbox, Mutt   (June 14, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3226: segfault in imap_sync_mailbox, Mutt   (June 14, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3226: segfault in imap_sync_mailbox, Mutt   (June 14, 2009)  
   
• [Mutt] #3227: UI freeze and checkpoint ignored on readonly mailbox, Mutt   (May 14, 2009)
  • Re: [Mutt] #3227: UI freeze and checkpoint ignored on readonly mailbox, Mutt   (May 14, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3227: UI freeze and checkpoint ignored on readonly mailbox, Mutt   (May 14, 2009)  
  • Re: [Mutt] #3227: UI freeze and checkpoint ignored on readonly mailbox, Mutt   (June 07, 2009)  
   
• Re: [Mutt] #1046: Request that the "uncolor" command work with, Mutt   (May 15, 2009)
• Re: [Mutt] #2226: wish: Let me know if POP messages has been lost, Mutt   (May 15, 2009)
• Re: [Mutt] #2225: pop: Ignore already-deleted messages while syncing, Mutt   (May 15, 2009)