Re: Threading representation within Index

[Mun Johl <Mun.Johl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rocco,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM PDT, Rocco Rutte wrote:
RR> 
RR> 
RR> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:08:58PM -0700, Mun Johl wrote:
RR> >
RR> > I'm trying to find out what else I need to modify in the header so that
RR> > mutt can function properly.
RR> 
RR> I think you also want to look at least at References: or In-Reply-To:
RR> (and sometimes Message-Id:). These are the only headers related to
RR> threading (and subject, depending on $strict_threads).

It seems Outlook doesn't do a very good job forwarding the References:
or In-Reply-To: fields; so Mutt is forced to thread via the Subject: (I
think).

Thanks for the information.  I'll have to give this some thought.

-- 
Mun