Re: [PATCH 03 of 16] Since contex_sb might be uninitialized, it is

[Thomas Roessler <tlr@xxxxxx>]

On 15 Mar 2009, at 14:11, Rocco Rutte wrote:

> Hi,
>
> * Erik Hovland wrote:
>
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Erik Hovland <erik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > # Date 1236890095 25200
> > # Branch HEAD
> > # Node ID b4cf86788470dceb7bc4f80edc7f9b7098839a43
> > # Parent  abb26dfac5656d678607e215f36a1c52db460a19
> > Since contex_sb might be uninitialized, it is
> > better to zero it and remove the condition
> > that does that.
>
> I think this patch is bad:

It is, indeed.