Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
Rocco Rutte wrote: [Fri Aug 15 2008, 04:21:41AM EDT]
> * Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 13 at 12:27 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
>
>>> This patch makes me uneasy (especially during a freeze), but I'm
>>> willing to apply it if no one else objects. I don't see what kind of
>>> damage a hook might do in batch mode, but I can't convince myself
>>> that it's harmless either.
>
>> Well, I imagine anyone currently using mutt in batch mode on a regular
>> basis (e.g. with cron) already has a working setup, and enabling hooks
>> by default has the potential at least to break those setups.
>
> If either way isn't documented (e.g. hooks do/don't work in batch mode)
> IMHO it can be seen as a bug that needs to be fixed. When it possibly
> breaks setups, we add a note to UPDATING.
I think the conversation directly related to this patch ended
with this comment from Rocco. Any chance we can still see this
patch applied?
Thanks,
Aron