Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
- To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:52:29 -0500
- Cc: agriffis@xxxxxxxxx
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=NYH7LYVWanNXRlUzk3Gnfth rJCQ=; b=Le34W8QSorqIRrqFVtPMXTFvdx6aEgNZUv4kLcd581P4arnc6u/0kea AbKqFLDb1O+nPzQVTeicPhP9gWQ5AeQNKZ63BhxsV9B2GbpyzggdOqDnZdNyv/b6 HDtPIT36vli7i1X/vo8WUA12OoTjZ2KWbivYZP5+k+o4337nA7WY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=ZJv6TSR+WUNdlNndZBRn6qMCO8egdGH+w0gBr2COpqdKAwx1jM7OuBoGHOPBm2TIksQnQjvDGWDnJ+N1SlR8SfqUKf47C7TvFHZwBKRidHGoWmKFGV6Q0uA3o2l5tYuZE9oBVHlMf3FE6JZppwlE0wDvUTGP2QHdXa/5AGpVZiQ=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20080813072702.GB16071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx, agriffis@xxxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20080722230456.GB12467@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080722231300.GC12467@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080813072702.GB16071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-07-21)
On Wednesday, August 13 at 12:27 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
This patch makes me uneasy (especially during a freeze), but I'm
willing to apply it if no one else objects. I don't see what kind of
damage a hook might do in batch mode, but I can't convince myself that
it's harmless either.
Well, I imagine anyone currently using mutt in batch mode on a regular
basis (e.g. with cron) already has a working setup, and enabling hooks
by default has the potential at least to break those setups.
Perhaps it'd be better to have a flag for enabling hooks?
~Kyle
--
All men dream; but not equally.
-- T. F. Lawrence (of Arabia)
Attachment:
pgp5cvjAJoacq.pgp
Description: PGP signature