<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [patch] sorting efficiency



On Wednesday, 10 September 2008 at 16:21, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2008-09-10 12:53:41 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> 
> > This reads fine to me. I'm not sure I'm crazy about the
> > SHORT_STRING change in compare_* though - it'd be nicer if we
> > could just do fewer comparisons. I grant that we use fixed-length
> > buffers all over the place. Some day maybe we should think about
> > keeping a buffer pool around :)
> 
> I guess part of the reasoning is that if the first 128 characters of
> an e-mail address are identical, nobody will be able to see the
> difference on screen anyway. ;-)

Fair enough :) Feel free to push.

Attachment: pgpK51n0Q4n6m.pgp
Description: PGP signature