Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
From: David Champion <dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:03:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <20080813152824.GB30590@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20080722230456.GB12467@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080722231300.GC12467@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080813072702.GB16071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080813145229.GB35964@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080813152824.GB30590@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-04-09)

> IMHO mutt should ditch the stable/devel concept and make releases
> similar to kernel.org.  We're never going to fix all the
> outstanding bugs for 1.6, so we should release it *now*.  Make
> point releases (1.6.1 etc) to fix Really Bad Bugs, but otherwise
> concentrate on 1.7.  To simplify from kernel.org, stop
> maintaining 1.6 as soon as 1.7 is released.

FWIW, I agree that would be lovely.  Even/odd stable/unstable release
versioning is the worst thing Linux has contributed to open source
software development.

-- 
 -D.    dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx    NSIT    University of Chicago

References:
- [PATCH] make send-hooks work for batch mode
  - From: Aron Griffis
- [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
  - From: Aron Griffis
- Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
  - From: Brendan Cully
- Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
  - From: Kyle Wheeler
- Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
  - From: Aron Griffis

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature
Next by Date: Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread