Re: [Mutt] #3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field
#3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field
Comment (by Aron Griffis):
{{{
Mutt wrote: [Sun Jul 06 2008, 08:31:50AM EDT]
> That would be a bad idea (I guess) because it significantly increases
> memory use to eventually "only" fix these corner cases of totally broken
> message-ids. Since the headers of the message are part of the header
cache
> that approach would also significantly increase cache file size on disk.
pdmef, you might be right, but I had already prototyped it so
here is my patch for reference. Note that the header cache
doesn't grow with my patch because only the strings are stored.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3090#comment:>