Re: [Mutt] #3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way

To: mac@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Mutt] #3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way
From: Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 01:02:46 -0000
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <038.11478369a4c8d8ea1eca3d0f84e29014@xxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
References: <038.11478369a4c8d8ea1eca3d0f84e29014@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

#3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way

Comment (by calmar):

 Hi Alain,

 >
 >     Maybe something is reading the inbox, or messing with its access or
 > modification timestamps?
 >

 Yeah, true, that seems to be the thing - the mail-checking script what
 reads the inbox did it.


 Sorry no bug in that case.

 I just need to find out, what to do beeing able to read that file without
 changing the access-time or reseting it with 'touch' or whatever.

 Cheers
 marco

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3049#comment:2>

References:
- [Mutt] #3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way
  - From: Mutt

Prev by Date: mutt: 2 new changesets
Next by Date: Re: [Mutt] #3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way
Previous by thread: Re: [Mutt] #3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way
Next by thread: Re: [Mutt] #3049: c<ret> won't work on the spoolfile in a solid way
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread