Re: [Mutt] #2914: mutt-1.5.16: Patches for minor enhancements
#2914: mutt-1.5.16: Patches for minor enhancements
Comment (by Vincent Lefevre):
{{{
On 2007-06-18 10:40:10 -0000, Mutt wrote:
> * edit-visual.udiff --> OPS compose.c functions.h
>
> New function "edit-visual / OP_COMPOSE_EDIT_VISUAL".
>
> Therefore it is possible to have two editors at the same time:
> + The fast builtin editor for small mails.
> + The individual visual editor for big mails.
> Default binding: v
AFAIK, Mutt's builtin editor is just a line editor and is not used
for typing mails. I don't see the point of this patch (there's already
edit-message to edit the message).
> * makefile.dotlock.udiff --> Makefile.in
>
> + Update of make variable "mutt_dotlock_DEPENDENCIES".
> + New make variable "mutt_dotlock_CFLAGS".
> + New target "mutt_dotlock.$(OBJEXT):" for compiling
> "mutt_dotlock".
>
> I'm not familiar with GNU automake. Therefore i didn't modify
> "Makefile.am".
Makefile.in is generated from Makefile.am (thus is not in the
repository). So, this patch is invalid.
> * makefile.dst.udiff --> contrib/Makefile.in
doc/Makefile.in
Ditto.
> * space-is-default.udiff --> curs_lib.c
>
> <Space> additionally triggers the default if a yes/no question
> is asked.
I'm not really in favor of accepting <Space> too, unless this is
well-accepted (e.g. also used by other software).
> * visual-editmsg.udiff --> editmsg.c
>
> Minor modification of the first argument of "mutt_edit_file":
> Additionally use "Visual".
Same remark as above.
Now, the manual should be more detailed concerning the difference
between $editor or $visual (since in practice, $editor is used as
a visual editor).
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2914#comment:>