On Monday, 02 April 2007 at 11:07, Derek Martin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:18:11AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > Here are two patches that attempt to fix tempfile creation on NFS, > > VFAT and SSHFS. > > I'd personally like to take a look at these, but I won't have time > until later in the week... What bug number(s) are the SSHFS/VFAT > bugs? (or, I can just search for them when I get the chance...) I don't think they have bugs filed. I just noticed them following some messages back from mutt-dev to mutt-users. > Would it be worthwhile to create a separate list for (potential) > security issues related to Mutt? These days I don't find Mutt lacking > for any features I'd really like to have (except for a couple that > would be hard to implement, or require a complete re-write, or > generate user outrage from a variety of people), so I'm not inclined > to watch the dev list very closely anymore. But bugs and patches > related to security issues I am particularly interested in watching... Maybe. But aside from my recent BTS spam and some very long threads about PATH which you may have seen, mutt-dev is often fairly calm.
Attachment:
pgpUR0lvlOa6p.pgp
Description: PGP signature