On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:20:52PM +0000, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Once we find a solution for aborted writes, I think the user is > responsible for maintaince of the cache as he's it now for header cache > too. And this is one of the reasons I don't like the header cache much. It makes things faster, but I'm kind of uncomfortable with the number of people coming up in the last X months with reports of segfaults who've been told to delete their cache and restart. It makes mutt significantly more fragile. I also personally believe that if a program is going to have a cache, it should maintain it, not the user. Firefox, IE, Opera, Outlook, Pegasus etc. don't just grow caches without bound. -- Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature