<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [PATCH] Remove absolute paths from gpg.rc



FWIW, while I agree with Paul's request, I also agree with Oswald's "state of
the discussion" update.  I think Derek might have been a bit out of line
attacking me personally earlier (and I might have been out of line possibly
attacking Derek personally earlier still), but this wouldn't be the first time
we started a flame war on this list.  That's why I strongly second Paul's
request not to turn this into yet another flame war.  (Derek, on the other hand,
would be better served by diffusing the discussion into a flame war, since
current Mutt behavior is closer to what he wants than to what I want, AFAICT.)

 - Dave


On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:38:15PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:57:25PM +0000, Paul Walker wrote:
> > This thread seems to be getting a bit personal in places. Can people
> > please keep the discussion related to mutt (or at least security)...?
> > 
> well, i expected somebody to say something like that. actually, the one
> calling me anti-american is still missing. ;)
> obviously, i think that the discussion still *is* relevant to mutt's
> security, otherwise i'd take it off-list.
> 
> for the record, my choices were:
> - ignore dave. this would be silly - based on the same reasoning as used
>   in the mail in question.
> - fight him on the basis of every possible technical aspect. pointless,
>   obviously.
> - simply show him how his line of argumentation is fundamentally flawed
>   (he seems to like that fu-word :). if you think that the used reasoning
>   or comparisons are getting too personal, then it's too bad ... for
>   you. :-P  SCNR
>   his choices are now:
>   - ignore me
>   - flame me, in which case i will ignore him
>   - show me how my argumentation is flawed
>   - accept that i'm right and based on that rethink his own position
>     towards a more differentiated one, based on pragmatic and not on
>     ideological arguments. this doesn't even mean changing the actual
>     position, as in the $PATH case we seem to agree mostly. ;)
> 
> ok, enough theoretizing. :)
> 
> -- 
> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
> --
> Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.