<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:25:19 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <20070317074753.GY14658@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
References: <d61d41715015d975d564.1172898761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070316121510.GA3106@xxxxxxxx> <20070317040549.GN23035@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070317074753.GY14658@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, David Laight wrote:

In which case wouldn't 177 be better?


Unless mutt creates directories too.

--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

References:
- [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
  - From: Brendan Cully
- Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
  - From: Christoph Berg
- Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
  - From: Derek Martin
- Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
  - From: David Laight

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove absolute paths from gpg.rc
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove absolute paths from gpg.rc
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add $umask for mailboxes and attachments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread