Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address

To: mutt developers list <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
From: Moritz Barsnick <barsnick@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:53:39 +0200
In-reply-to: <20060927092335.GG473@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20060926135314.GC24412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m38xk68izf.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060926212741.GA27636@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060927092335.GG473@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:23:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Using the compile time definition is very silly! This breaks any
> (binary) packaging system. The FQDN should be obtained at run time.

Oh yes indeed! This has broken my mailing system once or twice
before.

I second this (especially since --without-hostname is now fixed and
doesn't set the hostname to "no" anymore ;->>).

Moritz

References:
- [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
  - From: Gary Benson
- Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
  - From: Matthias Andree
- Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
  - From: Gary Benson
- Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
Next by Date: Fcc: ~/sent
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Generate Message-IDs from sender address
Next by thread: Fcc: ~/sent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread