Re: small configury update
Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxx> writes:
> I object to that change. While 1.9 is documented as requirement, I found
> no difficulties building mutt after aclocal-1.6;automake-1.6, and there
> seems to be a considerable installed base of automake 1.8 based
> systems. Let's not put spokes in their wheels.
I haven't tried 1.7 and 1.8 either although installed, that's waste of
time. 1.9 works, 1.6 works, it's free and publicly available without
registration, and various automake versions can peacefully coexist.
Period. :o)
--
Matthias Andree