mutt/2310: Mutt doesn't honor multiple Reply-to addresses (RFC 2822)
>Number: 2310
>Notify-List:
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: Mutt doesn't honor multiple Reply-to addresses (RFC 2822)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: normal
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Jun 27 05:23:23 +0200 2006
>Originator: Chris Doherty
>Release: Mutt 1.5.11 (2005-09-15)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Linux 2.6.13.4
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
-DEBUG
+HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK -DL_STANDALONE
-USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK -USE_INODESORT
-USE_POP -USE_IMAP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL -USE_GNUTLS -USE_SASL
-HAVE_REGCOMP +USE_GNU_REGEX
+HAVE_COLOR -HAVE_START_COLOR -HAVE_TYPEAHEAD -HAVE_BKGDSET
-HAVE_CURS_SET -HAVE_META -HAVE_RESIZETERM
+CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME
+BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT
+ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET
+HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR
+HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID -HAVE_GETADDRINFO
+USE_HCACHE
>Description:
given a message with multiple Reply-to addresses, Mutt only picks the first
one. in section 3.6.2., "Originator fields" of RFC 2822:
an optional reply-to field MAY also be included, which contains the field name
"Reply-To" and a comma-separated list of one or more addresses.
if there are multiple Reply-to addresses listed, I would expect Mutt to put all
of them in the To: field of the response.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Unknown
>Add-To-Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: