<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [PATCH] Fix memory function use



On Monday, 15 May 2006 at 12:14, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Brendan Cully [06-05-02 15:32:03 -0700] wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >You're probably right, it might be better to have check_sec look out
> >for & in the argument to safe_free or FREE.
> 
> I've extended to patch and added __FREE_CHECKED__ comments after
> double-checking the types of the arguments and added some comments in
> places where it's not too obvious.
> 
> The patch:
> 
>   
> <http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~pdmef/mutt/patches/patch-1.5.11-cvs.pdmef.mem.2.diff>
> 
> also changes all safe_free() to FREE() calls. With it, check_sec.sh
> doesn't produce false-positives any longer for the memory function
> calls.

Applied, thanks.

Attachment: pgpcyNqQcfSrw.pgp
Description: PGP signature