Re: ; tag-prefix for more than current thread
* Martin Trautmann <traut@xxxxxx> [2006-05-16 18:04 +0200]:
> Currently, I got your own mutt-patch-1.3.28.nr.threadcomplete which offers ~a
That's old and obsoleted by an improved version written by <insert the
name, I can't remember at the moment, here>.
> I guess, patch-1.5.6+20040904.tg.mutt-thread.3 applies yet another
> command, such as ~(~T)? patch-1.5.6+20040904.tg.mutt-thread.2 offered the
> ~a, too.
~(~T) is an example of what the patch can do. IIRC ~a is only a
compatibility pattern to be compatible with my patch, I think. But
IIRC that did not work correctly.
> Apart of those patches I'd prefer the more general approach that the
> tag-prefix could be used in a wider range.
I think this patch is not less general (nor more general) than what
you want. E.g. you can directly tag all threads containing an old
message ~(~r>10d).
If you don't like that, just write a patch to get what you want.
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas