Re: ; tag-prefix for more than current thread
On 2006-05-16 17:34, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Well, the way you'd do it with the current interface is to tag
> the trheads that you're looking at (esc-t, for each of them),
> and then apply the individual-message function.
Yes, and that's both difficult (lots of work for many threads), dangerous
(since esc-t does not only tag the current thread, but it does toggle the
tag. Thus you have to find a tagged message, untag it and apply esc-t
again). And it's not logical since a tag prefix could be expected to work
consistently whereever reasonable.