Re: mutt/2233: incorrect value for %d in attribution line
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2233; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: mutt/2233: incorrect value for %d in attribution line
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:29:44 -0700
Is your clock set correctly? What does 'date' say from your shell
prompt?
On Thursday, 11 May 2006 at 21:24, joel@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Number: 2233
> >Notify-List:
> >Category: mutt
> >Synopsis: incorrect value for %d in attribution line
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: normal
> >Priority: low
> >Responsible: mutt-dev
> >State: open
> >Keywords:
> >Class: sw-bug
> >Submitter-Id: net
> >Arrival-Date: Thu May 11 21:24:11 +0200 2006
> >Originator: Joel Aufrecht
> >Release: Mutt 1.5.11+cvs20060403
> >Organization:
> >Environment:
> System: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7 (i686) [using ncurses 5.5] [using libidn 0.5.18
> (compiled with 0.5.18)]
>
> patch-1.5.11.rr.compressed.1
> patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime
> patch-1.5.5.1.nt.xtitles.3.ab.1
> patch-1.5.6.dw.maildir-mtime.1
> patch-1.5.6.tt.assumed_charset.1
>
> >Description:
> When replying to an email, this custom line in my .muttrc controls the
> formatting
> set attribution="* %n <%a> [%(%d%b%y %H:%M)]:"
>
> The day of the month (i.e., the value of %d) in this formula is incorrect in
> the inserted text. It is 13 days in the future. All other fields are
> correct. If I comment out this line, the default is correct. I tried
> several other strftime codes, such as %e and %D, and they have the same
> problem.
>
> >How-To-Repeat:
> Add
> set attribution="* %n <%a> [%(%d%b%y %H:%M)]:"
> to .muttrc
>
> Start mutt on 11 May 2006
>
> reply to an email
>
> observe this text in the attribution line:
> [24May06 17:37]:
> >Fix:
> Unknown
> >Add-To-Audit-Trail:
>
> >Unformatted: