<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt/2233: incorrect value for %d in attribution line



The following reply was made to PR mutt/2233; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 
Subject: Re: mutt/2233: incorrect value for %d in attribution line
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:29:44 -0700

 Is your clock set correctly? What does 'date' say from your shell
 prompt?
 
 On Thursday, 11 May 2006 at 21:24, joel@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
 > >Number:         2233
 > >Notify-List:    
 > >Category:       mutt
 > >Synopsis:       incorrect value for %d in attribution line
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Severity:       normal
 > >Priority:       low
 > >Responsible:    mutt-dev
 > >State:          open
 > >Keywords:       
 > >Class:          sw-bug
 > >Submitter-Id:   net
 > >Arrival-Date:   Thu May 11 21:24:11 +0200 2006
 > >Originator:     Joel Aufrecht
 > >Release:        Mutt 1.5.11+cvs20060403
 > >Organization:
 > >Environment:
 > System: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7 (i686) [using ncurses 5.5] [using libidn 0.5.18 
 > (compiled with 0.5.18)]
 > 
 > patch-1.5.11.rr.compressed.1
 > patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime
 > patch-1.5.5.1.nt.xtitles.3.ab.1
 > patch-1.5.6.dw.maildir-mtime.1
 > patch-1.5.6.tt.assumed_charset.1
 > 
 > >Description:
 > When replying to an email, this custom line in my .muttrc controls the 
 > formatting 
 > set attribution="* %n <%a> [%(%d%b%y %H:%M)]:"
 > 
 > The day of the month (i.e., the value of %d) in this formula is incorrect in 
 > the inserted text.  It is 13 days in the future.  All other fields are 
 > correct.  If I comment out this line, the default is correct.  I tried 
 > several other strftime codes, such as %e and %D, and they have the same 
 > problem.
 > 
 > >How-To-Repeat:
 > Add 
 > set attribution="* %n <%a> [%(%d%b%y %H:%M)]:"
 > to .muttrc
 > 
 > Start mutt on 11 May 2006
 > 
 > reply to an email
 > 
 > observe this text in the attribution line:
 > [24May06 17:37]:
 > >Fix:
 > Unknown
 > >Add-To-Audit-Trail:
 > 
 > >Unformatted: