Hi, * Brendan Cully [06-04-28 13:46:51 -0700] wrote:
you might consider mercurial. See mutt.kublai.com for hg/git/darcs repositories and some surprising stats about relative repository sizes (mutt's changelog commits are probably why git does so badly). The upcoming mercurial 0.9 release does even better.
I still have minor concerns that a python-based solution can do faster than the coding style of git. With repacking everything into just one git pack I get around 24 with my 16 local branches and changes.
I just don't want to deal with installing git (or whatever) on the target machine and rsync would be painfully slow with my uplink.
So the patches I dump out of my git tree must be sufficient. ;-) But thanks for the suggestion! bye, Rocco -- :wq!