Re: Sanitizing attachment file names : too much
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:45:26PM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:33:55PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> > It's actually consistent with what mutt has been doing for a
> > very long time on the code path that deals with saving an
> > individual attacahment.
>
> That doesn't mean it's right. ;-)
>
> (But since changing behaviour is a bad thing, it might as well stay that
> way...)
Changing behavior in a development version is NOT inherently bad,
particularly if the change is for the better, and it is clearly
documented.
--
Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.