Re: mutt/2068: record does not have a default

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt/2068: record does not have a default
From: Michael Tatge <Michael.Tatge@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 13:14:05 +0200
In-reply-to: <20060401225753.GL993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <mutt-pr-2068@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1EFck9-0007aZ-W0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060401201522.GA2454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060401225753.GL993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

* On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 Paul Walker (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> How about a patch to go with it? ;-)

Alain allready did the patch it only has be applied.

Michael
-- 
"We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds."
(Linus Torvalds about the superiority of Linux on the Amsterdam
Linux Symposium)

PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD
Jabber:     init[0]@amessage.de

References:
- mutt/2068: record does not have a default
  - From: cb
- Re: mutt/2068: record does not have a default
  - From: Michael Tatge
- Re: mutt/2068: record does not have a default
  - From: Paul Walker

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Header cache and slashes
Next by Date: Re: imap/2182: segFault on imaps folder change with mailboxes=.
Previous by thread: Re: mutt/2068: record does not have a default
Next by thread: Re: mutt/2068: record does not have a default
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread