Re: [PATCH] Header cache and slashes
Hello,
> Has this or something similar any chance to be included? I am all for
> it, as it doesn't only save disk space but lots of time -- with
> original behaviour I always end up having at least 2 caches for 1
> Maildir. I haven't encountered any problems so far.
if we include something like that, let us do it right and use the bash
unify path function and port it to mutt. That way it would also work for
symbolic links and constructs like ../../whatever
The previous submitted pach should not be included. Because there were
to much lines of code for the effect and it just fixes one case out of
one hundred.
Thomas