Re: [PATCH] expand mutt vars as we do environment vars
On 2006-01-13 at 14:31 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> MIME attachments are usually best, but in-line patches work
> nicely, too.
On 2006-01-13 at 15:10 +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 Phil Pennock (mutt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> > and if people let me know if they prefer the patches as a MIME
> > attachment, I'm happy to change).
>
> That would be more convenient, yes.
Okay, not a problem at all. I prefer MIME but had some vague memory of
seeing the list strip attachments -- probably getting confused between a
couple of lists I joined recently and unfairly mentally slandering the
mutt lists.
Sorry for the unnecessary inconvenience,
--
I am keeping international relations on a peaceable footing.
You are biding your time before acting.
He is coddling tyrants.
-- Roger BW on topic of verb conjugation