<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt/2144: Please always use ascii_strcasecmp to compare ASCII parameter strings



The following reply was made to PR mutt/2144; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 
Subject: Re: mutt/2144: Please always use ascii_strcasecmp to compare ASCII 
parameter strings
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:37:59 -0800

 On Friday, 16 December 2005 at 15:45, Recai Oktas wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR mutt/2144; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Recai Oktas <roktas@xxxxxxxxxx>
 > To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: mutt/2144: Please always use ascii_strcasecmp to compare ASCII 
 > parameter strings
 > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:37:01 +0200
 >  * Brendan Cully [2005-12-13 20:18:49+0100]
 >  > Synopsis: Please always use ascii_strcasecmp to compare ASCII parameter s=
 >  trings
 >  >=20
 >  > **** Comment added by brendan on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:18:49 +0100 ****
 >  >  I'd like to see this patch with mutt_ascii_* changed back to ascii_*. I
 >  >  know it may seem a little inconsistent, but this patch doesn't make
 >  >  things better in that regard, since all the other callers are still
 >  >  using the old name. If you use the ascii_* form, this patch looks fine
 >  >  to me.
 >  
 >  Sorry for the late response.  I've successfully tested the patch attached.
 >  It seems to work without any observed problem.
 >  
 >  Regards,
 >  
 >  roktas
 >  
 >  Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=iso-8859-9
 >  Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mutt_ascii_strcase.patch"
 >  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Ok. Now I just have to figure out how to degnatsify the patch. Might
 be time to start looking at alternative BTSes again :)