Re: mutt/2114: S/MIME algorithm choice too long
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2114; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt/2114: S/MIME algorithm choice too long
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:42:24 +0200
On 2005-10-17 06:15:04 +0200, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> > Then, you'd get one of:
> >=20
> > 1: DES, 2: Triple-DES, (c)lear?
> > 1: RC2-40, 2: RC2-64, 3: RC2-128, (c)lear?
> > 1: AES128, 2: AES192, 3: AES256, (c)lear?=20
> > =20
> > What do you think of that idea?
I guess I'd leave out the "clear" bit in these submenus -- doesn't
make particularly much sense to me to duplicate it on both menu
levels.
> But I, as a user, prefer yours.
So do I.
--=20
Thomas Roessler =B7 Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.