<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt/2114: S/MIME algorithm choice too long



On 2005-10-17 06:15:04 +0200, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:

>  > Then, you'd get one of:
>  > 
>  >   1: DES, 2: Triple-DES, (c)lear?
>  >   1: RC2-40, 2: RC2-64, 3: RC2-128, (c)lear?
>  >   1: AES128, 2: AES192, 3: AES256, (c)lear? 
>  >  
>  > What do you think of that idea?

I guess I'd leave out the "clear" bit in these submenus -- doesn't
make particularly much sense to me to duplicate it on both menu
levels.

>  But I, as a user, prefer yours.

So do I.

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.