Re: mutt/2114: S/MIME algorithm choice too long
On 2005-10-17 06:15:04 +0200, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> > Then, you'd get one of:
> >
> > 1: DES, 2: Triple-DES, (c)lear?
> > 1: RC2-40, 2: RC2-64, 3: RC2-128, (c)lear?
> > 1: AES128, 2: AES192, 3: AES256, (c)lear?
> >
> > What do you think of that idea?
I guess I'd leave out the "clear" bit in these submenus -- doesn't
make particularly much sense to me to duplicate it on both menu
levels.
> But I, as a user, prefer yours.
So do I.
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.