<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: What should go into 1.5.7?

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
From: Paul Walker <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:29:50 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050918201743.GA6797@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20050918201743.GA6797@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.10i

On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Frederik Eaton wrote:

> Is this message getting through?

It's getting through, but I don't know how much time Thomas has for the list
these days. Brendan might be your best bet... Brendan?

-- 
Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Frederik Eaton

References:
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Frederik Eaton

Prev by Date: mutt/2074: clarify documentation about pop_checkinterval
Next by Date: [2005-09-19] CVS repository changes
Previous by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Next by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread