<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt: Improve const correctness



> If you were to go down this road to the end, almost every parameter
> would be marked const. It's very rare for mutt functions to write to
> parameter variables, and furthermore harmless.

There are enough data structures that are written to over mutable pointers. 
Some function signatures were const-correct already.


> Now that your patch is in a form where it can be tested, I've
> discovered that it
> a) breaks compilation in a number of places.

There are more candidates for correction. Would anybody else like to fix the 
remaining parts?

Regards,
Markus