Re: mutt: Improve const correctness
> If you were to go down this road to the end, almost every parameter
> would be marked const. It's very rare for mutt functions to write to
> parameter variables, and furthermore harmless.
There are enough data structures that are written to over mutable pointers.
Some function signatures were const-correct already.
> Now that your patch is in a form where it can be tested, I've
> discovered that it
> a) breaks compilation in a number of places.
There are more candidates for correction. Would anybody else like to fix the
remaining parts?
Regards,
Markus