On 2005-08-03 07:35:16 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > I guess my argument is that toggle-unlink is intuitively like the > difference between save-message and copy-message: first you move > the attachment somewhere else, then you unlink it. In normal > usage (when you send or postpone the message), mutt behaves > non-destructively. Having it actually destroy something that > can't be recreated, with no warning, seems a little less > intuitive. I don't think I get your point here. In normal usage mutt behaves "non-destructively" precisely because you don't use toggle-unlink. If you use toggle-unlink, you basically tell the program that this particular file is temporary, and not worth anything except in the context of a message. From that point of view, it makes perfectly sense to delete it if it's removed from the list of attachments. -- Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
Attachment:
pgpTuM0Mi5PC9.pgp
Description: PGP signature