<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [RFC] Kill off --with-nss?

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kill off --with-nss?
From: md@xxxxxxxx (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 19:20:12 +0200
In-reply-to: <20050801164738.GA5099@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050801164738.GA5099@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Aug 01, Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are a couple of outstanding bug reports to do with the NSS
> implementation of SSL support. I believe this was originally written
> to deal with openssl licensing problems. GNUTLS accomplishes the same
Correct. I fully support killing it.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Kill off --with-nss?
  - From: Brendan Cully

References:
- [RFC] Kill off --with-nss?
  - From: Brendan Cully

Prev by Date: Re: use_from (was Re: your mail)
Next by Date: Re: mutt/893: Mailbox size not updated when attachments are deleted
Previous by thread: [RFC] Kill off --with-nss?
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Kill off --with-nss?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread