Re: another silly question
On 2005-04-23 10:45:23 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The point behind having the external dotlock helper is to make sure
> that we can do the dotlocking with the necessary privileges.
Sometimes it guesses wrong.
> The best approach if you want to install a custom mutt version on a
> system that has mutt_dotlock installed elsewhere is to just *ignore*
> the fact that "make install" bails out complaining about a chgrp.
> Then, use your mutt configuration to point to the pre-installed
> mutt_dotlock. That way, you get your private mutt, but still have
> the necessary locking rights.
Or use Tamotsu Takahashi's sysdotlock patch.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA