Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
On Monday, 21 March 2005 at 10:21, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:43:45PM +0100, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> > > I misread the documenation. UIDVALIDITY is 32bit not 64bit. I will send
> > > a patch shortly.
> >
> > here is the patch. Some people should test it before it is reported
> > upstream. For me it works.
>
> Thank you.
>
> I have only 32bit machines, so, uint32_t is unsigned int.
> Now there is no problem for _me_.
>
> But, wouldn't some environment need this attached patch?
> I'm afraid "%u" is not for uint32_t on some systems.
wouldn't it be simpler just to use 'unsigned int' instead?
- References:
- sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))