<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:10:31 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050319095150.GH25808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20050319072145.GD25808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050319080718.GA39342@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050319085014.GF25808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050319092223.GA2052@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050319095150.GH25808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

Hello Tamo,
I misread the documenation. UIDVALIDITY is 32bit not 64bit. I will send
a patch shortly.

        Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann

References:
- sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
  - From: YONETANI Tomokazu
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
  - From: Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#262272: mutt: segfault while sorting mailbox
Next by Date: Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
Previous by thread: Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
Next by thread: Re: sscanf (x, "%u", &(uint64_t))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread