On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:12:20PM -0500, John J. Foster wrote: > > For some mailbox types - mbox, for example - it would involve re-reading > > the mailbox every time. This would make things rather slow. > I forgot to mention that these are all IMAP mailboxes. Sorry for the > omission. It would seem a little strange to do it for one type of mailbox and not another. Which isn't to stop anyone writing a patch, obviously, but it would still seem strange. :-) -- Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature