Re: Installation fails because of mutt_dotlock
On 2005-02-03 18:41:04 +0000, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:55:34PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Why would they do that...?
> > This is what I currently do. I need to do that each time I resintall
> > Mutt. :(
>
> But why do you do this? What does it accomplish...?
By default, Mutt looks for the mutt_dotlock it has installed. So,
I replaced it by a symlink pointing to the system mutt_dotlock.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA