Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 12:54:06PM -0500, John J. Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:50:02PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > If there are any patches you want to see included with 1.5.7, please
> > re-submit them to mutt-dev by Thursday evening. 1.5.7 due on Friday.
> >
> > (Mads is right, I should return to release early, release often.)
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Thomas Roessler ? Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
> Good morning all,
>
> I have been following this list closely since the apparent demise of
> mutt-users. I am NOT a developer, but rather a very happy user of mutt.
> I've played occasionally with just about all the other mail clients
> available, but always return to the one that sucks less. That does not
> mean I wouldn't very much like certain features that 1 or another client
> provides.
>
> My reasons for still looking for a different client have been stated
> in both this thread, and the mutt-ng fork thread. I have'nt noticed much
> in the way of comments from folks like myself (just plain users), so
> here's what I'd like that would keep me from evaluating other packages
> for awhile
>
> basic SMTP services
> support for IMAP IDLE
> inclusion of the IMAP header cache
> a decent addressbook
NNTP
ability to disconnect and reconnect IMAP coonnections without exiting
>
> I do not know the difficulty in implementing any of these, but they have
> remained the reasons for a few years that I keep looking.
>
> Thanks for letting me rant.
>
> Back to lurking,
> John
>
> --
> It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a
> clearer picture of reality than those who wield it.
> Noam Chomsky
--
It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a
clearer picture of reality than those who wield it.
Noam Chomsky