<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Why isn't it part of mutt "proper"



On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 05:00:44PM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:

>       database are NFS safe and *nonblocking*. Read: It tries to open
>       the cache rw, if that fails ro, if that fails not. *Without* any
>       blocking.

Out of interest, what's the behaviour if it opens it read-only, then new
mail arrives? Presumably some of the headers are found in the cache, while
others are read as-before?

How long does each mutt hold the database read/write, anyway? As long as you
have the "folder" open?

-- 
Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature