On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:40:32PM EDT, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > What are you suggesting Exim should do with the Bcc field? Well, Derek says the ideal is to setup a separate message with a Bcc header for each recipient (and by common sense, he'd appear to be perfectly right), but even sendmail's default behavior is substantially safer than Exim's default behavior. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgp1HOFPdDVJz.pgp
Description: PGP signature