Re: color/uncolor (was: Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection)

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: color/uncolor (was: Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection)
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:24:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <20040714031205.GL22398@xxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040210071345.GA23743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040412204852.GT5807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040712070323.GQ2543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040712142005.GA44582@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040712180051.GH27149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040712184628.GF14973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040713043408.GJ22398@xxxxxxx> <20040714025805.GS14973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040714031205.GL22398@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On 2004-07-13 23:12:08 -0400, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote:

> Note: The uncolor command can be applied to the index object
> only.

Ugh, you're right.


-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

Attachment: pgpRSs0KWcuxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: David Champion
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: David Champion
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: David Champion
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: David Yitzchak Cohen
- Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- color/uncolor (was: Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection)
  - From: David Yitzchak Cohen

Prev by Date: color/uncolor (was: Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection)
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
Previous by thread: color/uncolor (was: Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread