Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:32:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <20040711150147.GB28755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040711074252.GF40196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040711133212.GA32316@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040711150147.GB28755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On 2004-07-12 00:01:47 +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:

> I want to know why he has been ignoring some posts while he has
> been replying to some other posts.

Mostly because I can't devote as much time to this as I would like to.

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

Attachment: pgpuyahxrb2z6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
  - From: Derek Martin
- Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

Prev by Date: Re: bug#1882: mutt-1.5.6i: reverse_name is used when composing a _new_ message when viewing aanother one (not in index)
Next by Date: Re: bug#1882: mutt-1.5.6i: reverse_name is used when composing a _new_ message when viewing aanother one (not in index)
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
Next by thread: Re: Fwd: mutt-1.5.6i: [PATCH] option to not include attachments in replies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread