On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Derek Martin wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 04:42:52PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote: > > So you have no reason to reject this (if this patch has no bugs). > > :) That doesn't mean it will be accepted... Yeah, my intention was to make Thomas say something. :) I want to know what he thinks. He said he accepted assumed_charset, but has not committed it yet. I want to know why he has been ignoring some posts while he has been replying to some other posts. > For the grammar pedants: in English, we reply TO a message. There are > a few places (such as this one) where you left out the "to" in your > patch. Thanks! I hope that doesn't mean my patch will be rejected. :) -- tamo
Attachment:
pgpeVhWvmg6pW.pgp
Description: PGP signature