Re: bug#1869: mutt: segfaults on mbox with binary junk in headers
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 12:59:13PM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 08:12:13PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
>
> > More mutt-dev readers would have examined the bug
> > if the mbox had been attached as an attachment.
>
> I'd agree with this, BTW. Saving an attachment is always significantly
> easier than trying to get an in-line thing out-of-line (IYSWIM) in one
> piece.
And I'd disagree, because I don't (usually) open attachments on mails
from mailing lists - It takes too many key strokes.
David
--
David Laight: david@xxxxxxxxx