<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

bug#1137: marked as done (mutt should display keyid for which it wants the mantra)



Your message dated Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:53:41 +0200
with message-id <20040412195341.GN5807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and subject line bug#1826: mutt-1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i: mutt lies to me when 
saying secret key not found
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Herr der Kaefer
(administrator, GUUG bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.guug.de; 29 Mar 2002 13:40:26 +0000
>From md@xxxxxxxx Fri Mar 29 14:40:26 2002
Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix)
        by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 16qwcE-0007b3-00
        for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:40:26 +0100
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id C7C025FA8B; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:38:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix/Md, from userid 1001)
        id AA58F33B27; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:35:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>
To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: mutt should display keyid for which it wants the mantra
X-GUUG-CC: 140430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <20020329133520.AA58F33B27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:35:20 +0100 (CET)

Package: mutt
Version: 1.3.28-1
Severity: minor

[NOTE: this bug report has been submitted to the debian BTS as Bug#140430.
Please Cc all your replies to 140430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .]

From: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mutt should display keyid for which it wants the mantra
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:14:42 +0100

        Hi!

 If one has more than one secret key it's hard to guess just from the
indexpage which mantry an encrypted received mail wants to have:

Enter PGP passphrase:

 It would be more than helpful if at least the keyid and the main uid of
that key will be shown, too.

 As the people that use more than one secret key are rather few this I
set this just to Severity: minor but it should be treated higher because
it's rather annoying to have to ^Forget the passphrase and reenter the
one for the real needed key.

 Thanks,
Alfie
--=20
  * The 'Yes, I need more sleep, and also to test my releases' release.
 -- David Mart=EDnez Moreno, changelog.Debian for freecraft (1.17pre1buil=
d16-4)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 1826-done) by bugs.guug.de; 12 Apr 2004 19:52:12 +0000
>From roessler+bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mon Apr 12 21:51:28 2004
Received: from does-not-exist.info ([217.160.221.198] 
helo=kamino.does-not-exist.org)
        by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BD7Sq-00022E-00
        for <1826-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:51:28 +0200
Received: from raktajino.does-not-exist.org (p5085647F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 
[80.133.100.127])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by kamino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 35F95193368; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:54:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by raktajino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
        id 8F8A28497D; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:53:41 +0200
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: alfie@xxxxxxx, 1826-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bug#1826: mutt-1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i: mutt lies to me when saying 
secret key not found
Message-ID: <20040412195341.GN5807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1B0Jzj-0002Hx-00@tausendmorgenwald>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1B0Jzj-0002Hx-00@tausendmorgenwald>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-106.9 required=4.0
        tests=AWL,BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
              REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
              USER_IN_WHITELIST
        autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

On 2004-03-08 13:36:31 +0100, alfie@xxxxxxx wrote:

>  Mutt simply lies to me: I have multiple private keys, with different
> secret keys. Mutt seems to assume that they have all the same and
> a) doesn't ask me which key it wants the mantra for,
> b) seems to simply try the cached mantra for a different key (uh?? Why
>    isn't the cached mantra keyid-fixed??)
> c) and simply lies and says it can't find the secret key, when it just
>    used the wrong mantra on the right secret key.
> 
>  It doesn't display anywhere what key it wants the mantra for, this is
> more than annoying. Have to guess from the index which key this message
> might be for, ^Forget the old mantra and enter the right one.

Unfortunately, mutt does not know *anything* about the key the
message is encrypted to -- that's gnupg's, or pgp's business.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                       <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>