<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

bug#1826: marked as done (mutt-1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i: mutt lies to me when saying secret key not found)



Your message dated Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:53:41 +0200
with message-id <20040412195341.GN5807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and subject line bug#1826: mutt-1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i: mutt lies to me when 
saying secret key not found
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Herr der Kaefer
(administrator, GUUG bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.guug.de; 8 Mar 2004 12:34:15 +0000
>From alfie@xxxxxxx Mon Mar 08 13:33:46 2004
Received: from biedermanns.com
        ([213.133.98.83] helo=mail.biedermanns.com ident=mail)
        by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1B0Jx4-0002mB-00
        for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:33:46 +0100
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
        by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp 
        (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1B0Jy3-0002O7-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:34:47 +0100
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1B0Jzj-0002Hx-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:36:31 +0100
From: alfie@xxxxxxx
Subject: mutt-1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i: mutt lies to me when saying secret key not 
found
To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <E1B0Jzj-0002Hx-00@tausendmorgenwald>
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:36:31 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0
        tests=NO_REAL_NAME
        version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.5.1-200401
Severity: normal

-- Please type your report below this line

        Hi!

 Mutt simply lies to me: I have multiple private keys, with different
secret keys. Mutt seems to assume that they have all the same and
a) doesn't ask me which key it wants the mantra for,
b) seems to simply try the cached mantra for a different key (uh?? Why
   isn't the cached mantra keyid-fixed??)
c) and simply lies and says it can't find the secret key, when it just
   used the wrong mantra on the right secret key.

 It doesn't display anywhere what key it wants the mantra for, this is
more than annoying. Have to guess from the index which key this message
might be for, ^Forget the old mantra and enter the right one.

 Thanks,
Alfie

-- System Information
System Version: Linux tausendmorgenwald 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Wed Feb 18 21:59:13 EST 
2004 i686 GNU/Linux

-- Build environment information

(Note: This is the build environment installed on the system
muttbug is run on.  Information may or may not match the environment
used to build mutt.)

- gcc version information
cc
Lese Spezifikationen von /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.3/specs
Konfiguriert mit: ../src/configure -v 
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr 
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info 
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib 
--enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit 
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm 
--enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux
Thread-Modell: posix
gcc-Version 3.3.3 (Debian)

- CFLAGS
-Wall -pedantic -g -O2

-- Mutt Version Information

Mutt 1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i (2003-11-05)
Copyright (C) 1996-2002 Michael R. Elkins und andere.
Mutt übernimmt KEINERLEI GEWÄHRLEISTUNG. Starten Sie `mutt -vv', um
weitere Details darüber zu erfahren. Mutt ist freie Software. 
Sie können es unter bestimmten Bedingungen weitergeben; starten Sie
`mutt -vv' für weitere Details.

System: Linux 2.4.24-1-686 (i686) [using ncurses 5.3] [using libidn 0.3.4 
(compiled with 0.3.4)]
Einstellungen bei der Compilierung:
-DOMAIN
-DEBUG
-HOMESPOOL  +USE_SETGID  +USE_DOTLOCK  +DL_STANDALONE  
+USE_FCNTL  -USE_FLOCK
+USE_POP  +USE_IMAP  +IMAP_EDIT_THREADS  -USE_GSS  -USE_SSL  +USE_GNUTLS  
+USE_SASL  +USE_SASL2  
+HAVE_REGCOMP  -USE_GNU_REGEX  
+HAVE_COLOR  +HAVE_START_COLOR  +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD  +HAVE_BKGDSET  
+HAVE_CURS_SET  +HAVE_META  +HAVE_RESIZETERM  
+CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP  +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME  -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME  
-BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS  -SUN_ATTACHMENT  
+ENABLE_NLS  -LOCALES_HACK  +COMPRESSED  +HAVE_WC_FUNCS  +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET 
 +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR  
+HAVE_ICONV  -ICONV_NONTRANS  +HAVE_LIBIDN  +HAVE_GETSID  +HAVE_GETADDRINFO  
ISPELL="/usr/bin/ispell"
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail"
MAILPATH="/var/mail"
PKGDATADIR="/usr/share/mutt"
SYSCONFDIR="/etc"
EXECSHELL="/bin/sh"
MIXMASTER="mixmaster"
Um die Entwickler zu kontaktieren, schicken Sie bitte
eine Nachricht (in englisch) an <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>.
Um einen Bug zu melden, verwenden Sie bitte das Programm flea(1).

patch-1.5.5.1.tt.compat.1-cl
patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime
patch-1.5.3.rr.compressed.1
patch-1.5.4.helmersson.incomplete_multibyte
patch-1.5.4.fw.maildir_inode_sort
patch-1.3.23.1.ametzler.pgp_good_sign
patch-1.5.3.Md.gpg_status_fd
patch-1.4.Md.gpg-agent
patch-1.5.3.Md.etc_mailname_gethostbyname
patch-1.5.1.cd.edit_threads.9.2
patch-1.3.27.bse.xtitles.1
Md.use_debian_editor
Md.muttbug
patch-1.4.admcd.gnutlsdlopen.53d
patch-1.4.admcd.gnutlsbuild.53d
patch-1.4.admcd.gnutls.56d

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 1826-done) by bugs.guug.de; 12 Apr 2004 19:52:12 +0000
>From roessler+bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mon Apr 12 21:51:28 2004
Received: from does-not-exist.info ([217.160.221.198] 
helo=kamino.does-not-exist.org)
        by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BD7Sq-00022E-00
        for <1826-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:51:28 +0200
Received: from raktajino.does-not-exist.org (p5085647F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 
[80.133.100.127])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by kamino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 35F95193368; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:54:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by raktajino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
        id 8F8A28497D; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:53:41 +0200
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: alfie@xxxxxxx, 1826-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bug#1826: mutt-1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i: mutt lies to me when saying 
secret key not found
Message-ID: <20040412195341.GN5807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1B0Jzj-0002Hx-00@tausendmorgenwald>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1B0Jzj-0002Hx-00@tausendmorgenwald>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-106.9 required=4.0
        tests=AWL,BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
              REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
              USER_IN_WHITELIST
        autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

On 2004-03-08 13:36:31 +0100, alfie@xxxxxxx wrote:

>  Mutt simply lies to me: I have multiple private keys, with different
> secret keys. Mutt seems to assume that they have all the same and
> a) doesn't ask me which key it wants the mantra for,
> b) seems to simply try the cached mantra for a different key (uh?? Why
>    isn't the cached mantra keyid-fixed??)
> c) and simply lies and says it can't find the secret key, when it just
>    used the wrong mantra on the right secret key.
> 
>  It doesn't display anywhere what key it wants the mantra for, this is
> more than annoying. Have to guess from the index which key this message
> might be for, ^Forget the old mantra and enter the right one.

Unfortunately, mutt does not know *anything* about the key the
message is encrypted to -- that's gnupg's, or pgp's business.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                       <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>