On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:21:26AM EST, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: David Yitzchak Cohen in <20040204024109.GB14769@xxxxxxx> > > Why don't you just do something like this instead? > > folder-hook =folder1 fcc-hook =folder1 > > folder-hook =folder2 fcc-hook =folder2 > > etc. > > That's ugly. That's not nearly as ugly, when you consider how easy it is to do for most fairly standard configurations: > > ...so you can just put this in your muttrc: > > source "ls ~/mail | sed 's/(.*)/folder-hook =\1 fcc-hook =\1/'|" :-) (Note that the above doesn't work in stock 1.5.6i, due to a bug introduced a while ago in fixing another bug. You'll need a fairly recent CVS (or a 1.4.x - which still has the other bug since nobody bothered to fix it, so it never got this bug; or a 1.5.x where (x<=5), before the other bugfix that caused the new bug) if you want to do that.) > I'm using the following in conjunction with the trash_folder patch: > > folder-hook . 'set trash="=trash/trash"' > folder-hook IN/. 'push ":set trash=\"^.trash\"\n"' That's an interesting way of automating things, actually. . . - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgptCcdOizwF0.pgp
Description: PGP signature