On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:24:51PM EST, Fernan Aguero wrote: > I am trying to get sent messages saved to the current > folder. Why don't you just do something like this instead? folder-hook =folder1 fcc-hook =folder1 folder-hook =folder2 fcc-hook =folder2 etc. > I've seen some patches that do this. I'm currently using a > mutt v1.4.1i patched with Richard Hitier's save_current > patch. Now I can say save_current=yes in my muttrc and get > all sent-messages saved in the current folder. It overrides fcc-hooks, too? > However I've also seen some patches by Byrial Jensen, that > create a shortcut for the current folder (^) that can be > used to set fcc-hooks. I prefer this approach, since I can > then decide to save to the current folder or to a general > outbox. Well, the folder-hook approach above gives you the same power, and you can generate the config automatically with a script like this: ls ~/mail | sed 's/(.*)/folder-hook =\1 fcc-hook =\1/' ...so you can just put this in your muttrc: source "ls ~/mail | sed 's/(.*)/folder-hook =\1 fcc-hook =\1/'|" HTH, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgprGTzqCLsN6.pgp
Description: PGP signature