Re: bug#1787: mutt-1.5.5.1i: Mutt does not remove the Bcc header
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:20:54AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> No, it does not work as expected by default with exim (which does
> exactly what the RFC says).
Do exim and sendmail do the same thing?
Either way, doing something which you know will have the effect of breaking
previously working configurations when there's no particularly good reason
for doing so just seems perverse to me.
> At least there should be a big warning if the default is not changed.
Most people never read the default config file, you should know that. :)
--
Paul
People who used magic without knowing what they were doing usually
came to a sticky end. All over the entire room, sometimes.